The Law As Storyteller

“Imaginative work … is like a spider’s web … attached to life at all four corners … one remembers that these webs are not spun in mid-air by incorporeal creatures, but are the work of suffering human beings, and are attached to grossly material things like health and money and the houses we live in …” Virginia Woolf, “A Room of One’s Own”

The Law can take itself too seriously, believing that its purpose, its most important task, is to put the papers in numbered order, or to bring down the gavel with an admonitory frown delivered from a pedestal.

Yet the law’s purpose among the many others – to redistribute wealth, to quiet claims to real estate, to tell people what their obligations are under a contract, to punish the wicked – the law’s purpose is to record what happened within the confines of a court, or other legally sanctified place, on a particular day, and to set out in an orderly way the reality of events and human behavior as structured by the artificiality of a specific legal proceeding, or case.

Between the covers of those forbidding brown and black bound compilations of cases and commentary are chronicles of lust and greed, reports of foolishness and the seemingly unchanging lust for power. Court cases have ever been rich in drama and narrative.

This website includes the records of several cases involving the life and work of Florence Kelley in Chicago: Ritchie v. People (Ritchie I) (1895), the case challenging the constitutionality of the Illinois Factory and Workshop Inspection statute; Muller v. Oregon (1908), the United States Supreme Court case upholding a state statute limiting the number of hours women could work in laundries, factories and mechanical establishments; and Ritchie v. Wayman (Ritchie II)(1910), the case brought to the Illinois Supreme Court after Muller v. Oregon.

These three high court opinions involve principles and statutory interpretation important to a specialized segment of constitutional legal history. The hearings before the lower court and the facts and arguments presented in the Factory Inspection Annual Reports and in the Briefs and transcripts for these cases are filled with details about how people lived and worked in the sweatshops and tenements of Chicago at this time.

The legal records are brimming with the stories of individual people: the young women working in the sweatshops who were directly effected by the new law; the working children and what their jobs were and what could be regulated regarding that; and then the various adults, the men and women, who had a job to do. This included the Illinois state factory inspectors; the four unnamed schedule men from the United States Bureau of Labor in Washington, D.C.; the Illinois legislators who came to investigate conditions in the Nineteenth Ward in preparation for passing the factory and workshop inspection law; the doctors and nurses who examined the children; the factory owners, the union organizers, the shop heads, the runners, the stitchers, the finishers, and the children coughing under the pile of unfinished cloaks in the single unheated room on the fourth floor which served as bedroom, kitchen, workroom and bathroom. Reading these records the curtain is pulled aside, and all are suddenly and immediately on stage.

Then there are the records from two days in March of 1892, transcripts and reports of the habeas corpus proceeding brought in a Cook County Chancery Court in Chicago by Florence Kelley’s husband, Dr. Lazare Wischnewetzky, when he sought custody of their three children. Readers in the twenty first century learn more about Florence Kelley’s marriage and domestic circumstances from this testimony than from all the biographies, or from her autobiography, or from the wonderfully expressive letters reverently preserved in libraries and archives in America and abroad.

The habeas corpus records and the transcript of Florence Kelley’s divorce hearing in 1899 are an example of how court records incidentally provide a perspective on a life, or a marriage, or a childhood. Those participating in those court proceedings did not think that what they were doing there was providing a snapshot of history, an odd and confusing jumble of words and reported words about matters mundane and personal – facts so painful that the principals probably never spoke directly of them again between themselves or to anyone else out of this context.

Yet the reports of behaviors reported in the transcripts and offered as ‘evidence’ to resolve the legal dispute – who should have custody of the three children, where should the children live, are there legal grounds for divorce – these reported behaviors, and the commentary upon them by others, speak to us directly, and are alive, vibrant, and fresh. It is as if we ourselves were present in the Honorable Frank Baker’s court room on a March day in 1892.

Then the divorce hearings seven years later, in the same court room, based upon the same evidence as presented in the habeas corpus action, raise as many questions as are resolved in the formal legal action to be decided by the court: the granting of an ex parte petition for divorce. Why didn’t Florence Kelley seek a divorce earlier? Why does she call herself Mrs. Florence Kelley, a name with no meaning, an illegal name? Was there any contact with Lazare Wischnewetzky in the intervening period? Did he ever visit or see his children?

In the personal letters and diaries, in the published papers, Florence Kelley as well as her friends and her publicly minded family members – her father, Frederich Engels, Jane Addams – are writing very self consciously in anticipation of future readers. The court records, the transcripts of what people did and what they said about it, are, if not unrehearsed, at least directed towards another purpose: the making of a factual record for the purpose of resolving a legal dispute, the establishment or proof of a fact or series of facts, which will form the basis for a ruling.

The legal outcome of the hearing or trial is a ruling this is abuse justifying a divorce, these are facts supporting a finding that this young girl was underage and not healthy enough to work in that factory on that specific day. And so the particularity of the facts breathe life into a time, a place, persons, and tell a tale. The stories from these records pick themselves up from their procedural confines and walk right into our consciousness. Major and minor characters stride on and off stage, as, with a sharp intake of breath, we become aware of the law’s role as preservationist, as curator of the culture of the past.

Of course, there are many lies and falsehoods in these ostensibly objective records, many representations which are untrue, in the trivial and profound sense. This makes the records all the more interesting, as we peer into the mysterious and endless labyrinth of human planning and ambition, the pride and foolishness of men and women, doing this and that, talking about it, making representations about it, and by definition probably doing the best they could under the circumstances. Just asking the question draws us further into the web.

The law itself becomes a character in this drama, as is the Nineteenth Ward, the political battleground for many of the fights involving these people, as is the City Council of Chicago, the Governor of Illinois, the Illinois State Legislature, the Supreme Court of Illinois – all play their parts. These august institutions are all inhabited by people, by individuals who have lives, a history of their own, as these same institutions do today.

The law is wonderfully temperamental, even tempestuous, and what it keeps, arbitrary. This piece of testimony is part of the record, becomes evidence, is put in a box, or placed in a volume, and then copied or microfilmed, and now digitalized, and that piece of paper, that which might have been evidence, won’t be saved, can’t be part of the record, is unavailable to us, gone forever. And so the law stamps its lilliputian foot, and the dust of one hundred years ago settles in one pattern, and not another.

This website, its legal records, the stories found here, the commentary and the events which were a part of the lives of the people who appear here, are placed on this site to be explored. One inquiry will lead to another, then another – or so it has been for us – and soon the reader has entered the tapestry. We hope you will join us in finding the journey interesting, amusing, curious, and challenging.

Next: The Factory Inspection Reports

Vickers, Alonzo K.

Alonzo K. Vickers was born in Massac County, Illinois on September 25, 1853. His parents, who originated from Tennessee, came to Illinois in 1844 in search of land. They purchased a farm in Massac County and remained there the rest of their lives. Alonzo was the youngest in the family with two older brothers; however, he would soon be responsible for providing for his family. In 1861, Alonzo’s father died and when the Civil War broke out, both of Alonzo’s brothers went to fight.

The Civil War era was considerably difficult for the Vickers’ family. Alonzo was responsible not only for attending school, but also had to perform the majority of work around the farm. When he was 19 years old, Vickers’ received a teaching certificate and chose to make his living by teaching after he graduated from high school. He taught for six years; however, during his time teaching, Vickers began to study law under Judge R. W. McCartney. Finally, Vickers was admitted to the bar at the age of 29. In 1880, shortly before he was admitted to the bar, Vickers married his childhood sweetheart, Leora Armstrong. The couple moved to Johnson County, Illinois, and Vickers began his private practice of law. The couple went on to have two daughters, and a son.

In Johnson County, Vickers became involved in politics and in 1886 was elected to the Illinois legislature. He chose to serve only one term, and then decided to resume his practice of the law. He did not, however, disappear from the public eye. In 1891, Vickers was elected a Circuit Court Judge in the First District. He held this position 11 years, and was re-elected in 1897, and 1903. In 1903 Vickers was appointed to be on the Appellate Court of the Second District.

Vickers remained on the Appellate court until 1906, at which time he was elected to serve on the Supreme Court of Illinois. Vickers sat on the bench for eight years, and served as Chief Justice in 1910. In addition to his career as a lawyer, legislature, and judge, Vickers was also a member of several selective organizations, including the Masons, the Knights of Pythias, the Independent Order of Odd Fellows, and the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks.

In 1915, his eighth year on the Supreme Court, Vickers was up for re-election; however, January 16, Vickers began suffering from a combination of asthma and pneumonia. On January 21, 1915, Alonzo K. Vickers died in his home in East St. Louis, Illinois.

Next: Jacob Wilson Wilkin


Sources:

Washburne, Hempstead

Hempstead Washburne was born on November 11, 1852 in Galena, IL . He was the son of Congressman Elihu B. Washburn, Congressman, Secretary of State under Grant and United States Minister to France. Washburne, a member of the Republican Party, served as Chicago’s 27th mayor from 1891-1893. At his inauguration on April 27, 1891, Washburne spoke of Chicago’s role in the upcoming World’s Fair: “We are called upon to serve the city at a time most vital to its interests, and I trust that we shall each and all be able to bury and forget any personal, party or other quarrels, and remember only that we are given this trust to prepare our city to receive the world in 1893.” He died April 13, 1918 and is interred in Chicago’s Graceland Cemetery.

Next: Judges>Joseph M. Bailey

Wilkin, Jacob Wilson

Jacob Wilson Wilkin was born in Newark, Ohio, on June 7, 1837, to Virginia natives Isaac Wilkin and Sarah (Burner) Wilkin. At the age of eight, Jacob Wilkin moved to Crawford County, Illinois, with his parents. Although Isaac Wilkin had originally been a contractor builder in Ohio, he became a farmer on arrival to Illinois and purchased a farm in Marshall, Illinois.

Jacob had eight brothers and sisters, and he and his siblings spent most of their youth working the family land. After receiving a preliminary education in Crawford County, Jacob attended McKendree College in St. Clair County. Although Wilkin intended to immediately pursue a career in law, the outbreak of the Civil War caused him to enlist as a private among a group of Clark County volunteers. When the 130th Illinois infantry formed on October 25, 1862, Wilkin was elected captain, an honor he considered his greatest accomplishment.

As captain of the Illinois 130th, Wilkin received several special assignments. After first serving under General Grant in the campaign against Vicksburg, Capt. Wilkin and his company were assigned to the special duty of guarding the headquarters of General Grant. He was then transferred to the staff of General Ransom, and finished his military service with the captures of the Spanish Fort and Fort Blakely. Wilkin remained in command of his company until the fall of 1865 although the Confederate army had already been defeated. He was promoted to the rank of major at the end of the war for “gallant services in the field.” Despite the promotion Wilkin resigned from the military to pursue a career in law.

Wilkin chose to return to Marshall, Illinois, and studied law under John Scholfield. Once Wilkin was admitted to the bar in 1866, he and Scholfield went into private practice together until Scholfield became an Illinois Supreme Court judge in 1873. Wilkin continued the private practice until 1879.

In 1880 Wilkin was elected to the fourth judicial circuit of Illinois. He was re-elected to the circuit in 1885, and after moving to Dansville in Vermilion county was appointed to the Appellate Court of the 4th District where he served until 1888.

In 1889 Wilkin was elected to the Illinois Supreme Court representing the 3rd Supreme District following the vacancy on the Supreme Court Bench left by Judge John. M Scott. He was re-elected to the Illinois Supreme Court in 1897, and 1906. Serving close to 19 years on the bench, twice Wilkin acted as Chief Justice to the Illinois Supreme Court.

He was married twice in his lifetime and had five children, three of which survived. His first marriage to Alice E. Constable immediately followed his return from the Civil War. Ms. Constable was the daughter of the prominent Illinois Judge, Charles H. Constable. Wilkin had all of his children by Ms. Constable, of which two sons and a daughter lived to see adulthood. Following the death of his first wife, he married Sarah E. Archer in the fall of 1885. Ms. Archer was the daughter of another Illinois Judge, Judge Whitlock from Marshall, Illinois.

In his life time, Wilkin was a member of the societies of the Masons, Scottish Rite, and Knights of Pythias. He was also an active Republican, and was selected by the Republicans in his district in 1872 to serve as a presidential elector. Wilkin was an active member of the Methodist Episcopal Church and was said to be a deeply religious man. He was considered to be a man of great simplicity resembling the conduct of “old Southern Gentlemen” accredited to his father’s Virginia routes.

He was a widely respected member of the Illinois Supreme court known for his skill of oration and courtesy. Although Wilkin showed particular favor to young lawyers, he was considered an open-minded and impartial judge. John Wilson Wilkin died in office on April 3, 1907, from an unknown illness. At this time he was reportedly preparing his dismissal papers.

Next: Lawyers>Andrew Bruce


Sources:

  • “Judge Jacob W. Wilkin- An Appreciation.” Illinois Law Review. June, 1907. Volume II, Number 2. pgs 67-77. Nineteenth- Century Masterfile. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • “Honorable Jacob W. Wilkin.” The Daily Inter Ocean, (Chicago IL) Saturday, February 04, 1888: pg 5; Issue 314; col C. Nineteenth-Century Newspapers. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • “Jacob Wilkin: Previous Supreme Court Justice,” http://www.state.il.us/court/supremecourt/justicearchive/Bio_Wilkin.asp.